CDRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Cadre Holdings's net margin of 12.58%. Cadre Holdings's return on equity of 12.82% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity of 17.42%.

Cadre Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.2%. On the other hand Curtiss-Wright has an analysts' consensus of $418.39 which suggests that it could fall by -8.36%. Given that Cadre Holdings has higher upside potential than Curtiss-Wright, analysts believe Cadre Holdings is more attractive than Curtiss-Wright.

Cadre Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.621%.

Cadre Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Curtiss-Wright offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Cadre Holdings pays 38.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadre Holdings quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are smaller than Curtiss-Wright quarterly revenues of $805.6M. Cadre Holdings's net income of $9.2M is lower than Curtiss-Wright's net income of $101.3M. Notably, Cadre Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.85x while Curtiss-Wright's PE ratio is 40.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadre Holdings is 2.56x versus 5.43x for Curtiss-Wright. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sturm Ruger & has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Cadre Holdings's net margin of 5.72%. Cadre Holdings's return on equity of 12.82% beat Sturm Ruger &'s return on equity of 9.71%.

Cadre Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.2%. On the other hand Sturm Ruger & has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that Cadre Holdings has higher upside potential than Sturm Ruger &, analysts believe Cadre Holdings is more attractive than Sturm Ruger &.

Cadre Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sturm Ruger & has a beta of 0.109, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.076%.

Cadre Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Sturm Ruger & offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Cadre Holdings pays 38.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Sturm Ruger & pays out 38.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadre Holdings quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are smaller than Sturm Ruger & quarterly revenues of $135.7M. Cadre Holdings's net income of $9.2M is higher than Sturm Ruger &'s net income of $7.8M. Notably, Cadre Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.85x while Sturm Ruger &'s PE ratio is 20.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadre Holdings is 2.56x versus 1.21x for Sturm Ruger &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VSE has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Cadre Holdings's net margin of -3.51%. Cadre Holdings's return on equity of 12.82% beat VSE's return on equity of 1.56%.

Cadre Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.2%. On the other hand VSE has an analysts' consensus of $147.58 which suggests that it could grow by 10.62%. Given that Cadre Holdings has higher upside potential than VSE, analysts believe Cadre Holdings is more attractive than VSE.

Cadre Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VSE has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.499%.

Cadre Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. VSE offers a yield of 0.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Cadre Holdings pays 38.6% of its earnings as a dividend. VSE pays out 46.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadre Holdings quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are smaller than VSE quarterly revenues of $256M. Cadre Holdings's net income of $9.2M is higher than VSE's net income of -$9M. Notably, Cadre Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.85x while VSE's PE ratio is 170.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadre Holdings is 2.56x versus 2.34x for VSE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

V2X has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Cadre Holdings's net margin of 0.8%. Cadre Holdings's return on equity of 12.82% beat V2X's return on equity of 4.12%.

Cadre Holdings has a consensus price target of $43.83, signalling upside risk potential of 25.2%. On the other hand V2X has an analysts' consensus of $63.09 which suggests that it could grow by 41.4%. Given that V2X has higher upside potential than Cadre Holdings, analysts believe V2X is more attractive than Cadre Holdings.

Cadre Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison V2X has a beta of 0.214, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.581%.

Cadre Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. V2X offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadre Holdings pays 38.6% of its earnings as a dividend. V2X pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadre Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadre Holdings quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are smaller than V2X quarterly revenues of $1B. Cadre Holdings's net income of $9.2M is higher than V2X's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Cadre Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.85x while V2X's PE ratio is 34.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadre Holdings is 2.56x versus 0.33x for V2X. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.